Relationship Between Strategy and Structure Essay

Relationship Between Strategy and Structure - Essay Example of Excellence’ to better serve their mission of â€Å"Strengthen America’s Force of Decisive Action and provides the Nation an adaptable Army for an uncertain future†. These centers provide specialized training in certain areas of expertise that convey current war fighting requirements. TADOC is organized in a hierarchical fashion, with different factions dealing with their specified functions and goals and reporting directly to one higher up and the whole organization is headed by a Commanding General. The organization structure distributes resources and roles along strictly defined lines and the higher authority have the final say in formal policy determination, conflict resolution and reward and recognition. This is reflective of a structural framework approach to management with clear goals and information available for the organization strategy. The approach is a successful fit for an organization which has to train future soldiers for stressful and turbulen t conditions; though adaptability and quick thinking are traits which are to be induced in their students the organization is best served through rigid rules, policy and training regimes. With the most advance technology and data available to them for analysis and decision making, the structural framework lets the managers or leaders of the organization form future strategies which are to be followed by the whole work force. The strict management leads to an environment where commands are quickly followed and security and precautions related to their activity are highly emphasized. The centralized control is possible through the hierarchical structure which helps in implementing the development plans in the different sectors (human resource and technological) of TARDOC. While it culture and practices of the... The researcher states that strong leader ship is an essential part of any organizations success today. A structural framework point of view allows managers to set a strategy which can be utilized in environments of low uncertainty and be of the greatest fit with the structure or the external factors in which the organization has to work. The leader clearly defines roles, authority and responsibility along the lines of organizational goals and the focus is on facts, task and logic not on emotional aspects. The approach works best when cause and effect analysis are clearly understood with regards to the impact of the external environment and the organizations internal structure. Traditionally, it has been defined that a ‘company’s strategic options are bounded by the environment’. The approach is a successful fit for an organization which has to train future soldiers for stressful and turbulent conditions; though adaptability and quick thinking are traits which are to be induced in their students the organization is best served through rigid rules, policy and training regimes. The centralized control is possible through the hierarchical structure which helps in implementing the development plans in the different sectors. The paper written by Thompson, 1991, discusses the organization ‘Department of defense’ at pentagon with the same research analysis as was attempted in this essay. It is concluded that a proper restructuring of the department as consistent with their strategy could eradicate these problems.